[ OPEN-SOURCE RFP SPECIFICATION ][ CPA Firms ][ 2026 OFFICIAL RELEASE ]

CPA Firm Review Automation & Reputation Management RFP Specification (2026)

The procurement framework for CPA firms automating Google review collection, feedback quarantine, and ethics-compliant reputation management.

[ FORMAT: MARKDOWN / .DOCX / .XLSX ]·[ LICENSE: CC-BY-4.0 ]·[ REPO: cpa-firm-review-reputation-rfp ↗ ]
[ LIVING DOCUMENT ] Maintained by PracticeGrowth.Tech Standards & Compliance Research Group. Published under CC-BY-4.0.
View Git Source on GitHub ↗|
[ DIRECT EVALUATION CRITERIA ]

Core Procurement Benchmark

CPA firm review systems must automate post-engagement review invitations immediately after tax filing or advisory delivery, route unhappy clients to private resolution workflows before public posting, and comply strictly with State Board of Accountancy testimonial rules including Texas TSBPA Rule §501.82 and California CBA Reg §63.

[ REPUTATION TOOLKIT ]

Download the CPA Review Automation & Reputation RFP Committee Toolkit

Get the editable Microsoft Word (.docx) RFP specification, pre-populated with firm logo placeholders, and the companion weighted scoring sheet (.xlsx).

[ PACKAGE INCLUDES ]
  • ✓Review & Reputation System RFP (.docx)
  • ✓Review Velocity & Sentiment Scoring Template (.xlsx)
  • ✓3 Polite, High-Converting Review Request Scripts (SMS + Email)
  • ✓Negative Feedback De-escalation Protocol (.pdf)
https://
Instant download access. Zero spam. AICPA & fiduciary confidentiality respected.

CPA Firm Review & Reputation Management RFP Template

Use this template to solicit proposals from reputation management vendors. Customize sections 1-2 with your firm's specific information, then distribute to qualified vendors.


1. Project Overview & Goals

1.1 Project Summary

[Your firm name] is seeking proposals from qualified reputation management vendors to help us implement a compliance-first review generation and Google Business Profile optimization program.

Current State:

  • Google reviews: [X] reviews, [X.X] star rating
  • Yelp reviews: [X] reviews, [X.X] star rating
  • Facebook recommendations: [X] recommendations
  • Other platforms: [list any relevant platforms]

Primary Goals:

  1. Increase Google review count by [X]% within 12 months
  2. Improve average rating to [X.X] stars or higher
  3. Implement automated, compliance-safe review request workflows
  4. Optimize Google Business Profile for local search visibility
  5. Establish ongoing reputation monitoring and response protocols

1.2 Success Metrics

We will measure success through:

  • Review velocity (new reviews per month)
  • Average rating trends
  • Google Business Profile insights (search views, map views, direction requests, calls)
  • Review response time and quality
  • Client satisfaction with the review process
  • Compliance adherence (zero violations)

2. Firm Background

2.1 Firm Overview

  • Firm name: [Your firm name]
  • Year founded: [Year]
  • Number of locations: [X]
  • Primary service areas: [e.g., tax preparation, bookkeeping, advisory, audit]
  • Target client segments: [e.g., individuals, small businesses, specific industries]
  • Current website: [URL]
  • Social media presence: [list platforms]

2.2 Current Review Generation Efforts

What we've tried:

  • Asking clients in person after meetings
  • Email requests after engagements
  • Generic "review us" emails to all clients
  • Review request cards in tax returns
  • Other: [describe]

What's working:

  • [Describe any successful tactics]

What's not working:

  • [Describe pain points, low response rates, compliance concerns]

2.3 Technology Stack

Current systems:

  • Practice management: [e.g., Karbon, Canopy, TaxDome]
  • CRM: [e.g., HubSpot, Salesforce]
  • Email platform: [e.g., Gmail, Outlook]
  • Client portal: [e.g., existing portal, none]
  • Website CMS: [e.g., WordPress, custom]

Integration requirements:

  • Must integrate with [practice management system]
  • Must integrate with [CRM system]
  • API access required: [Yes/No]

3. Scope of Work

Vendors should propose solutions addressing the following areas:

3.1 Review Generation Strategy

Requirements:

  • Ethical solicitation workflows that comply with FTC guidelines and platform ToS
  • Multi-channel approach (email, SMS, in-portal, in-person)
  • Timing optimization based on client engagement lifecycle
  • Personalization by client segment and service type
  • Automated follow-up sequences for non-responders
  • Opt-out and suppression list management

Deliverables:

  • Review request workflow design and implementation
  • Email and SMS templates (compliance-reviewed)
  • Automation rules and triggers
  • A/B testing framework for message optimization
  • Monthly reporting on review generation performance

3.2 Google Business Profile Optimization

Requirements:

  • Primary and secondary category optimization
  • Business description optimization (750 character limit)
  • Service area configuration
  • Post strategy (updates, events, offers)
  • Q&A management (seeding and monitoring)
  • Photo optimization (exterior, interior, team, work)
  • Attributes and features completion
  • Products/services section setup

Deliverables:

  • GBP audit and optimization plan
  • Category research and selection
  • Content calendar for posts (minimum 12 months)
  • Q&A seeding strategy (minimum 20 FAQs)
  • Photo guidelines and optimization
  • Monthly GBP insights reporting

3.3 Review Monitoring & Alerts

Requirements:

  • Real-time notifications for new reviews across all platforms
  • Sentiment analysis and trend tracking
  • Competitive monitoring (top 3-5 local competitors)
  • Review response templates and approval workflows
  • Escalation procedures for negative reviews

Deliverables:

  • Monitoring dashboard setup
  • Alert configuration (email, SMS, Slack, etc.)
  • Response template library
  • Escalation matrix
  • Monthly reputation analytics report

3.4 Review Response Management

Requirements:

  • Response templates for positive, neutral, and negative reviews
  • Tone guidelines aligned with firm brand
  • Response time SLAs (e.g., 24 hours for all reviews)
  • Approval workflows for sensitive responses
  • Legal review process for defamatory or fake reviews

Deliverables:

  • Response template library (minimum 30 templates)
  • Tone and voice guidelines
  • Response workflow documentation
  • Training materials for staff
  • Monthly response quality audit

3.5 Reputation Analytics & Reporting

Requirements:

  • Review velocity tracking (by platform, by location)
  • Rating trend analysis
  • Sentiment analysis (positive, neutral, negative themes)
  • Competitor benchmarking
  • ROI measurement (review impact on lead generation)
  • Compliance audit trail

Deliverables:

  • Monthly reputation report (executive summary + detailed analytics)
  • Quarterly strategic review and recommendations
  • Annual reputation benchmark report
  • Custom dashboards for leadership team

3.6 Negative Review Management

Requirements:

  • Response strategy for 1-3 star reviews
  • Resolution workflow (internal investigation, client outreach, response)
  • Platform-specific removal request procedures
  • Legal escalation criteria and process
  • Documentation for compliance defense

Deliverables:

  • Negative review response playbook
  • Removal request templates and procedures
  • Legal escalation criteria
  • Case study library (anonymized examples)
  • Quarterly negative review trend analysis

3.7 Social Proof Integration

Requirements:

  • Review widget for website (Google, Yelp, Facebook)
  • Testimonial page design and content strategy
  • Schema markup implementation (Review, LocalBusiness)
  • Review feed for social media
  • Case study development from positive reviews

Deliverables:

  • Review widget implementation
  • Testimonial page content and design
  • Schema markup code and validation
  • Social media review graphics (templates)
  • Quarterly case study development

4. Platform Coverage

Vendors must demonstrate expertise across the following platforms:

Primary platforms:

  • Google Business Profile (required)
  • Yelp (required)
  • Facebook Recommendations (required)

Secondary platforms:

  • BBB (Better Business Bureau)
  • Apple Maps
  • Bing Places
  • Industry-specific: CPAFeed, AccountingToday, Clutch, G2

For each platform, vendors should specify:

  • Monitoring capabilities
  • Response capabilities
  • Review generation tactics (if applicable)
  • Platform-specific compliance considerations

5. Compliance & Ethics Requirements

This is non-negotiable. Vendors must demonstrate full compliance with:

5.1 FTC Endorsement Guidelines

  • No incentivized reviews (gift cards, discounts, free services)
  • No review gating (filtering clients before requesting reviews)
  • No fake reviews or astroturfing
  • Clear disclosure of material connections

5.2 Platform Terms of Service

  • Google: No review gating, no incentivization, no fake reviews
  • Yelp: No solicitation through Yelp's platform, no review gating
  • Facebook: No incentivization, no fake recommendations

5.3 TCPA Compliance (SMS)

  • Prior express written consent for all SMS messages
  • Clear opt-out mechanism (STOP keyword)
  • Message frequency disclosure
  • Record retention for consent documentation

5.4 CAN-SPAM Compliance (Email)

  • Clear sender identification
  • Accurate subject lines
  • Physical address inclusion
  • Opt-out mechanism in every email
  • Honor opt-out requests within 10 business days

5.5 State Accountancy Board Rules

  • Compliance with state-specific solicitation rules
  • Documentation of all review requests
  • Avoidance of false or misleading claims

Vendors must provide:

  • Written compliance policy
  • Staff training documentation
  • Audit trail for all review requests
  • Legal review of all templates and workflows
  • Quarterly compliance certification

6. Technical Requirements

6.1 Integration Requirements

  • Practice management system integration ([specify system])
  • CRM integration ([specify system])
  • Email platform integration ([specify platform])
  • API access for custom workflows
  • Webhook support for real-time events

6.2 Data Requirements

  • Data ownership: All data belongs to [Your firm name]
  • Data portability: Full export capability at any time
  • Data security: SOC 2 Type II compliance required
  • Data retention: [specify retention period]
  • Data deletion: Complete deletion upon request

6.3 User Experience

  • Admin dashboard for firm staff
  • Client-facing review request experience (mobile-responsive)
  • Multi-location support (if applicable)
  • White-labeling options (firm branding)
  • Role-based access controls

7. Timeline & Milestones

Proposed timeline:

Phase Duration Key Milestones
Discovery & Audit 2-3 weeks Current state assessment, competitor analysis, strategy development
Setup & Configuration 2-3 weeks Platform setup, integration, template creation, workflow design
Launch & Training 1-2 weeks Staff training, workflow go-live, initial review requests
Optimization Ongoing A/B testing, performance monitoring, strategy refinement

Vendors should provide:

  • Detailed project plan with weekly milestones
  • Resource allocation (who is doing what)
  • Risk mitigation plan
  • Rollback procedures if issues arise

8. Budget & Pricing

Vendors should provide detailed pricing for:

8.1 One-Time Costs

  • Discovery and audit
  • Platform setup and configuration
  • Integration development
  • Training and onboarding
  • Content creation (templates, guides, etc.)

8.2 Recurring Costs

  • Monthly platform/license fees
  • Monthly service retainer
  • Per-location fees (if applicable)
  • Per-review request fees (if applicable)
  • Overage charges

8.3 Pricing Model

  • Flat fee vs. performance-based
  • Contract length and renewal terms
  • Price increase caps
  • Early termination provisions

Total cost of ownership (12 months): $[X]


9. Vendor Qualifications

Vendors must demonstrate:

9.1 Experience

  • Minimum 3 years serving CPA/accounting firms
  • Minimum 10 current CPA firm clients
  • Case studies with measurable results (review count improvements, rating improvements)
  • References from similar-sized firms

9.2 Compliance Expertise

  • Dedicated compliance officer or legal counsel
  • Written compliance policies and procedures
  • Track record of zero violations
  • Understanding of FTC, TCPA, CAN-SPAM, and state board rules

9.3 Technical Capability

  • Proven integration experience with [practice management system]
  • API-first architecture
  • SOC 2 Type II certification
  • 99.9% uptime SLA

9.4 Team

  • Dedicated account manager
  • Compliance specialist
  • Technical support team
  • Content creation team

Vendors should provide:

  • Company overview and history
  • Team bios and qualifications
  • 3-5 CPA firm references (with contact information)
  • 2-3 detailed case studies
  • Compliance certification documentation

10. Evaluation Criteria

Proposals will be evaluated using the following weighted criteria:

Criterion Weight Description
Compliance & Ethics 25% FTC awareness, platform ToS adherence, no gating, no incentivization, TCPA/CAN-SPAM compliance
Review Generation Effectiveness 20% Ethical solicitation workflows, timing optimization, multi-channel capability, conversion rates
Monitoring & Analytics 15% Real-time alerts, sentiment analysis, competitor tracking, actionable reporting
Google Business Profile Expertise 15% Category optimization, post strategy, Q&A management, photo strategy, local pack impact
Pricing Model 10% Total cost, transparency, volume limits, scalability, ROI clarity
Integration Capability 10% Practice management triggers, CRM sync, API quality, workflow automation
Support Quality 5% Response times, strategic guidance, compliance updates, training resources

Evaluation process:

  1. Initial screening for completeness and compliance
  2. Scoring by evaluation committee using scorecard
  3. Vendor presentations (top 3 vendors)
  4. Reference checks
  5. Final selection

11. Submission Instructions & Deadline

Submission requirements:

  • Proposal document (maximum 50 pages)
  • Pricing spreadsheet
  • 3-5 client references
  • 2-3 case studies
  • Compliance certification
  • SOC 2 Type II report (or equivalent)

Submission deadline: [Date]

Submission format:

  • Email to: [email address]
  • Subject line: "Reputation Management RFP Response - [Vendor Name]"
  • PDF format preferred

Timeline:

  • RFP issued: [Date]
  • Vendor questions due: [Date]
  • Responses to questions: [Date]
  • Proposal deadline: [Date]
  • Vendor presentations: [Date range]
  • Selection decision: [Date]
  • Contract execution: [Date]
  • Project kickoff: [Date]

Contact information:

  • Primary contact: [Name, title, email, phone]
  • Technical contact: [Name, title, email, phone]
  • Compliance contact: [Name, title, email, phone]

Questions?

All questions about this RFP should be submitted in writing to [email address] by [date]. Responses will be shared with all prospective vendors.


This RFP template is provided by PracticeGrowth.Tech as a free resource for CPA firms. Customize it to fit your specific needs. The template is vendor-neutral — PracticeGrowth is not listed as a vendor option.

Framework developed and maintained by PracticeGrowth.Tech Standards & Compliance Research Group. Published under CC-BY-4.0 for open use by CPA and accounting firm partners.

Source repository: https://github.com/practicegrowth/cpa-firm-review-reputation-rfp

[ ARCHITECTURAL IMPLEMENTATION MESH ]

Turnkey Procurement Implementation & State Compliance

PracticeGrowth.Tech deploys and manages connected front-office systems engineered to fulfill this exact RFP specification, fully aligned with state accountancy board standards.

[ NATIONAL SOLUTION ]

Practice Growth CRM for Accounting Firms

Turnkey implementation managed exclusively for practice partners.

Inspect National Solution →
[ TEXAS DFW HQ ]

Texas Practice Hub

Statewide DFW headquarters aligned with TSBPA §501.82 advertising rules.

Texas Practice Standards →
[ CALIFORNIA HUB ]

California Practice Hub

San Francisco hub adhering to CBA Reg §63 fee & testimonial rules.

California Practice Standards →
[ MASSACHUSETTS HUB ]

Massachusetts Hub

Boston & Cambridge practices aligned with Mass 252 CMR standards.

Massachusetts Standards →
[ 3-MINUTE BENCHMARK ]

Benchmark Your Firm Against This RFP Standard

See exactly how your practice website, intake response, Google reviews, and AI-search discoverability measure up against modern 2026 practice benchmarks.

[ What the Leaks Are Costing You ]

See what a leaking practice quietly costs — in your numbers.

Even recovering a third of this changes your year. Get the full breakdown in your free Scorecard.

Illustrative estimate based on the inputs you provide. Individual results vary.

Estimated annual growth left on the table

$0

per year, walking out the door